The salary gap is bracket speed, not one big rate
The difference is where the pain starts. Portugal charges 44.6% on taxable income above €46,566 and 48% above €86,634, then a solidarity surcharge of 2.5% on the slice past €80,000.
Spain splits its scale between state and region; in Madrid the combined top rate is 45%, and the state half alone waits until €300,000 to reach 24.5%. Social security stretches the gap: a Portuguese employee pays 11% of the whole salary with no ceiling, while Spanish employee contributions are lower-rated and capped at a base of €61,214 a year, bar a fraction-of-a-percent solidarity slice above it. Spain therefore leads at every salary, and the lead grows with income (Spain, Portugal).
The freelance rows compare two philosophies
Portugal’s column runs the regime simplificado for a listed profession: tax falls on 75% of turnover no matter what you spent, and social security takes 21.4% of 70% of the same turnover. Spain’s autónomo deducts real expenses and pays RETA on a bracketed base capped at €61,214 a year, so the ten thousand euros of expenses in the defaults cuts the Spanish bill and leaves the Portuguese one untouched. The tables also ignore the arrival discounts: Portugal cuts the coefficients for the first two years and waives contributions for the first twelve months, and Spain swaps the percentage cuota for a flat €80 a month in year one, a figure the administration applies while the budget meant to fix it sits unpassed. The Portuguese and Spanish freelancer pages model the steady state.
Retained profit is the one row Portugal wins
Portugal charges 15% on the first €50,000 of profit and 19% on the rest, with further cuts already legislated. Spain’s small-company scale of 19% then 21%, open below €1,000,000 of prior-year turnover, sits above it at every profit level, and its general rate is 25%. Even Lisbon’s derrama municipal of 1.5% does not close the gap, and that rate is last year’s, flagged provisional because the new table is published only in the February after the year it applies to. Two flips worth knowing: a Spanish nueva creación company pays 15% flat for its first two profitable periods and undercuts Portugal; and a Portuguese company with small prior-year turnover escapes it entirely in most municipalities we model (Spain, Portugal).
The dividend hands Portugal’s corporate win back
Spain leaves a shareholder no choice: dividends land on the savings scale, from 19% to 30%, and a founder-sized distribution spends most of its length in the low-twenties bands. Portugal’s default is the taxa liberatória, a flat, final 28% on the first euro and the last. The founder chains invert the corporate row: Portugal saves at the company stage and hands more back at distribution, so on the defaults the Spanish founder keeps more of the same profit than the Portuguese one. Portugal does offer an escape Spain lacks: elect aggregation and only 50% of the dividend enters the general scale, often cheaper when other income is modest, though the election drags all of that year’s investment income onto the scale too.
The verdict is rented, not owned
Every row above is priced under each country’s default rules, from Madrid on one side and Lisbon on the other. Spain’s Beckham regime taxes employment income at a flat 24% up to €600,000, closed to ordinary freelancers. Portugal answers with IFICI at 20% on net employment and self-employment income for ten years, and IRS Jovem for the young: a full exemption in the first year of earning, tapering over ten. Madrid also does quiet work: it is the lightest of the five regional scales we model, and any other region narrows Spain’s salary and freelance lead. Sourcing and verification rules are on the methodology page.